Ok I’m putting a lid on this line of discussion right now.
I understand your points are coming from a place of good faith about diversity. I really do. But I also watched the acting staff make every conceivable effort and then some to ensure intersectional diversity during the whole process – that is, to make sure they weren’t biasing ourselves toward only the types of diverse we already are. They aggressively advertised the process to different countries’ facebook groups in the search for applicants. I even personally offered the Japanese netrunner community that they could submit applications in their native language and I would help translate if that would make any part of the process more comfortable. In the end it’s hard for me to imagine how we could have appeased Syntax’s demands without setting up literal quotas for different nationalities in advance which is frankly ridiculous. Oh and by the way the board is not all white anyway.
You want an anonymized list of demographics about the applicant pool? Fine. We’ll see what we can do. You wanna wrap that request up in sarcasm, attacks on how hard we worked as it was, and requesting us to divulge personal information? Miss me with that shit.
If this argument about whether the selection process did “enough” for diversity keeps going around in circles I am going to start deleting posts without mercy. I guess it’s better than the “too much diversity” bs but still. We did a heck of a lot as it is and we’ve got a board that will do a phenomenal job being intersectional going forward. Let’s celebrate that.