This is the first I heard of the commentary of the final of the Euro Nationals, and so I took it upon myself to watch the whole thing to get some context.
Let me just say, I found it eye rolling’ly boring; largely comprised of inside jokes; boys locker room talk, and just generally inappropriate and unprofessional conduct by some well known personalities within the community. It’s an embarrassment to those involved, and because of it’s public nature, does give a poor impression of the Netrunner community.
However:
It is largely unnecessary to turn this into something bigger than it is. It’s as clear as day that the general reputation of the two guys has been tarnished in the eyes of many, however the two commentators do not represent my local Netrunner community. More importantly, they don’t represent me; me as an individual.
Let’s keep things in perspective here. We’ve moved from two people who are clearly sorry for the fools they’ve made of themselves, and the potential embarrassment or offence they’ve caused to anyone; to now providing guidelines on how we should all act generally.
These sort of parental statements, about our use of language; what we should say when; the fact we may say things that could offend others and hence, we shouldn’t say them; are condescending; misguided; and potentially dangerous.
We are all adults, and we do not need a hobby website dictating our behaviour as individuals, in a very prescriptive manner. I do understand the sentiment, that we should treat each other with respect - that I can absolutely stand behind. This is as far as this article should have gone. But Stimhack isn’t the Netrunner communities Bible. We aren’t paid to play Netrunner, we don’t sign a code of conduct as part of a membership, we are free individuals to do as we please.
If an individual feels like using the term guys to represent a group of people, they can. If this upsets someone, they can address this, and talk about it. No individual player is under any obligation to reach out to a minority, or underrepresented group. General respectful conduct is of course a social norm, in any group setting, but if any one person doesn’t feel like reaching out to anyone in particular, minority or not, they are under absolutely no obligation to do so. Likewise, a minority shouldn’t feel obligated to reach out to a majority. Either group can do so if they wish; if they don’t want to, don’t.This may raise or lower their standing within any group; this may create conversation or questions about why any one person acts one way, and why someone else acts another; it may have no impact what so ever. This though is for the two people involved in the conversation. If we are to bring people together, we are also bringing ideas together, and likely points of view that run counter to each other. This is a good thing, and encouragement of the sharing of ideas should be encouraged.
This should not be squashed by censoring speech, because it results in people harbouring views which may be faulty and are never seen to be faulty because they are never exposed. Alternatively, ideas which have merit may never be known for fear they could offend someone.
General respectful conduct is to be encouraged, and especially so in a joint hobby community like Netrunner. However, pushing things to directing which minority groups we should reach to, or what specific words can or cannot be used is a bridge to far, and will end up alienating a swathe of people who actually want to be free and open individuals.