Home | About | Tournament Winning Decklists | Forums

Jinteki.net stats before switch to new MWL


#1

Jinteki.net will integrate the new MWL and FAQ changes soon.

Here’s a snapshot of the stats before the changes for posterity. It includes games played from June 24th till July 18th.

Cadash who’s undefeated and 1st on the Corp top has many unfinished games. I suspect he leaves his losing games before completion. He played mostly IG so that probably skews the IG stats as well.

The next player ranking will integrate the number of unfinished games in the ranking calculation.

Corp Meta

  1. “Haas-Bioroid: Engineering the Future”, “count” : 5755, “won” : 3067, “lost” : 2688, “winrate” : 0.5329278887923544
  2. “Near-Earth Hub: Broadcast Center”, “count” : 3828, “won” : 2503, “lost” : 1325, “winrate” : 0.6538662486938349
  3. “Argus Security: Protection Guaranteed”, “count” : 3270, “won” : 1929, “lost” : 1341, “winrate” : 0.5899082568807339
  4. “Pālanā Foods: Sustainable Growth”, “count” : 3094, “won” : 1943, “lost” : 1151, “winrate” : 0.6279896574014221
  5. “Jinteki: Personal Evolution”, “count” : 2769, “won” : 1530, “lost” : 1239, “winrate” : 0.5525460455037919
  6. “Blue Sun: Powering the Future”, “count” : 2653, “won” : 1419, “lost” : 1234, “winrate” : 0.5348661892197513
  7. “SYNC: Everything, Everywhere”, “count” : 2280, “won” : 1389, “lost” : 891, “winrate” : 0.6092105263157894
  8. “NBN: Making News”, “count” : 2080, “won” : 1120, “lost” : 960, “winrate” : 0.5384615384615384
  9. “Weyland Consortium: Building a Better World”, “count” : 1813, “won” : 963, “lost” : 850, “winrate” : 0.5311638168781025
  10. “New Angeles Sol: Your News”, “count” : 1341, “won” : 858, “lost” : 483, “winrate” : 0.639821029082774
  11. “Haarpsichord Studios: Entertainment Unleashed”, “count” : 1180, “won” : 679, “lost” : 501, “winrate” : 0.5754237288135593
  12. “Spark Agency: Worldswide Reach”, “count” : 1165, “won” : 707, “lost” : 458, “winrate” : 0.6068669527896996
  13. “Titan Transnational: Investing In Your Future”, “count” : 1079, “won” : 541, “lost” : 538, “winrate” : 0.5013901760889713
  14. “Gagarin Deep Space: Expanding the Horizon”, “count” : 1051, “won” : 565, “lost” : 486, “winrate” : 0.5375832540437678
  15. “Harishchandra Ent.: Where You’re the Star”, “count” : 937, “won” : 495, “lost” : 442, “winrate” : 0.528281750266809
  16. “Jinteki: Replicating Perfection”, “count” : 906, “won” : 509, “lost” : 397, “winrate” : 0.5618101545253863
  17. “NEXT Design: Guarding the Net”, “count” : 801, “won” : 357, “lost” : 444, “winrate” : 0.44569288389513106
  18. “Cybernetics Division: Humanity Upgraded”, “count” : 737, “won” : 255, “lost” : 482, “winrate” : 0.34599728629579374
  19. “Harmony Medtech: Biomedical Pioneer”, “count” : 716, “won” : 329, “lost” : 387, “winrate” : 0.4594972067039106
  20. “Jinteki Biotech: Life Imagined”, “count” : 666, “won” : 335, “lost” : 331, “winrate” : 0.503003003003003
  21. “Nisei Division: The Next Generation”, “count” : 577, “won” : 309, “lost” : 268, “winrate” : 0.5355285961871751
  22. “Industrial Genomics: Growing Solutions”, “count” : 559, “won” : 388, “lost” : 171, “winrate” : 0.6940966010733453
  23. “GRNDL: Power Unleashed”, “count” : 554, “won” : 276, “lost” : 278, “winrate” : 0.4981949458483754
  24. “Chronos Protocol: Selective Mind-mapping”, “count” : 526, “won” : 238, “lost” : 288, “winrate” : 0.4524714828897338
  25. “Tennin Institute: The Secrets Within”, “count” : 523, “won” : 243, “lost” : 280, “winrate” : 0.4646271510516252
  26. “The Foundry: Refining the Process”, “count” : 505, “won” : 202, “lost” : 303, “winrate” : 0.4
  27. “Haas-Bioroid: Stronger Together”, “count” : 504, “won” : 175, “lost” : 329, “winrate” : 0.3472222222222222
  28. “NBN: Controlling the Message”, “count” : 359, “won” : 233, “lost” : 126, “winrate” : 0.649025069637883
  29. “Custom Biotics: Engineered for Success”, “count” : 281, “won” : 105, “lost” : 176, “winrate” : 0.3736654804270463
  30. “Weyland Consortium: Because We Built It”, “count” : 278, “won” : 56, “lost” : 222, “winrate” : 0.2014388489208633
  31. “Cerebral Imaging: Infinite Frontiers”, “count” : 258, “won” : 131, “lost” : 127, “winrate” : 0.5077519379844961
  32. “Weyland Consortium: Builder of Nations”, “count” : 95, “won” : 29, “lost” : 66, “winrate” : 0.30526315789473685
  33. “NBN: The World is Yours*”, “count” : 88, “won” : 41, “lost” : 47, “winrate” : 0.4659090909090909

Runner Meta

  1. “Kate “Mac” McCaffrey: Digital Tinker”, “count” : 4941, “won” : 2329, “lost” : 2612, “winrate” : 0.47136207245496864
  2. “Andromeda: Dispossessed Ristie”, “count” : 4903, “won” : 2369, “lost” : 2534, “winrate” : 0.4831735672037528
  3. “Whizzard: Master Gamer”, “count” : 3561, “won” : 1905, “lost” : 1656, “winrate” : 0.5349620893007582
  4. “Noise: Hacker Extraordinaire”, “count” : 3146, “won” : 1280, “lost” : 1866, “winrate” : 0.406865861411316
  5. “Hayley Kaplan: Universal Scholar”, “count” : 2987, “won” : 1390, “lost” : 1597, “winrate” : 0.46534984934717105
  6. “Valencia Estevez: The Angel of Cayambe”, “count” : 2791, “won” : 1452, “lost” : 1339, “winrate” : 0.5202436402723039
  7. “Armand “Geist” Walker: Tech Lord”, “count” : 2301, “won” : 1150, “lost” : 1151, “winrate” : 0.4997827031725337
  8. “Chaos Theory: Wünderkind”, “count” : 1777, “won” : 633, “lost” : 1144, “winrate” : 0.3562183455261677
  9. “MaxX: Maximum Punk Rock”, “count” : 1589, “won” : 819, “lost” : 770, “winrate” : 0.5154185022026432
  10. “Leela Patel: Trained Pragmatist”, “count” : 1546, “won” : 796, “lost” : 750, “winrate” : 0.5148771021992238
  11. “Edward Kim: Humanity’s Hammer”, “count” : 1510, “won” : 563, “lost” : 947, “winrate” : 0.37284768211920527
  12. “Gabriel Santiago: Consummate Professional”, “count” : 1486, “won” : 670, “lost” : 816, “winrate” : 0.4508748317631225
  13. “Sunny Lebeau: Security Specialist”, “count” : 1330, “won” : 471, “lost” : 859, “winrate” : 0.35413533834586464
  14. “Jesminder Sareen: Girl Behind the Curtain”, “count” : 1185, “won” : 472, “lost” : 713, “winrate” : 0.3983122362869198
  15. “Adam: Compulsive Hacker”, “count” : 1145, “won” : 469, “lost” : 676, “winrate” : 0.4096069868995633
  16. “Ken “Express” Tenma: Disappeared Clone”, “count” : 1108, “won” : 434, “lost” : 674, “winrate” : 0.3916967509025271
  17. “Quetzal: Free Spirit”, “count” : 973, “won” : 416, “lost” : 557, “winrate” : 0.42754367934224047
  18. “Rielle “Kit” Peddler: Transhuman”, “count” : 885, “won” : 302, “lost” : 583, “winrate” : 0.34124293785310733
  19. “Reina Roja: Freedom Fighter”, “count” : 803, “won” : 291, “lost” : 512, “winrate” : 0.36239103362391034
  20. “Silhouette: Stealth Operative”, “count” : 598, “won” : 183, “lost” : 415, “winrate” : 0.3060200668896321
  21. “Laramy Fisk: Savvy Investor”, “count” : 507, “won” : 155, “lost” : 352, “winrate” : 0.3057199211045365
  22. “Apex: Invasive Predator”, “count” : 498, “won” : 197, “lost” : 301, “winrate” : 0.39558232931726905
  23. “The Professor: Keeper of Knowledge”, “count” : 478, “won” : 163, “lost” : 315, “winrate” : 0.3410041841004184
  24. “Nasir Meidan: Cyber Explorer”, “count” : 347, “won” : 107, “lost” : 240, “winrate” : 0.30835734870317005
  25. “Nero Severn: Information Broker”, “count” : 264, “won” : 89, “lost” : 175, “winrate” : 0.3371212121212121
  26. “Null: Whistleblower”, “count” : 245, “won” : 91, “lost” : 154, “winrate” : 0.37142857142857144
  27. “Iain Stirling: Retired Spook”, “count” : 168, “won” : 55, “lost” : 113, “winrate” : 0.3273809523809524
  28. “Exile: Streethawk”, “count” : 133, “won” : 59, “lost” : 74, “winrate” : 0.44360902255639095

Top 20 Corp players

  1. “cadash”, “count” : 53, “won” : 53, “lost” : 0, “winrate” : 1, “rating” : 0.7945205479452054
  2. “turtle”, “count” : 86, “won” : 72, “lost” : 14, “winrate” : 0.8372093023255814, “rating” : 0.7264150943396226
  3. “Maren”, “count” : 102, “won” : 82, “lost” : 20, “winrate” : 0.803921568627451, “rating” : 0.7131147540983607
  4. “kyokorebit”, “count” : 48, “won” : 43, “lost” : 5, “winrate” : 0.8958333333333334, “rating” : 0.7058823529411765
  5. “Ingseyl”, “count” : 122, “won” : 95, “lost” : 27, “winrate” : 0.7786885245901639, “rating” : 0.704225352112676
  6. “TugtetguT”, “count” : 109, “won” : 85, “lost” : 24, “winrate” : 0.7798165137614679, “rating” : 0.6976744186046512
  7. “sorano”, “count” : 82, “won” : 66, “lost” : 16, “winrate” : 0.8048780487804879, “rating” : 0.696078431372549
  8. “panda22”, “count” : 84, “won” : 66, “lost” : 18, “winrate” : 0.7857142857142857, “rating” : 0.6826923076923077
  9. “raphaeln”, “count” : 57, “won” : 47, “lost” : 10, “winrate” : 0.8245614035087719, “rating” : 0.6753246753246753
  10. “dkavaichan”, “count” : 134, “won” : 99, “lost” : 35, “winrate” : 0.7388059701492538, “rating” : 0.6753246753246753
  11. “dulux”, “count” : 143, “won” : 104, “lost” : 39, “winrate” : 0.7272727272727273, “rating” : 0.6687116564417178
  12. “donkeybum”, “count” : 82, “won” : 63, “lost” : 19, “winrate” : 0.7682926829268293, “rating” : 0.6666666666666666
  13. “cursor”, “count” : 114, “won” : 84, “lost” : 30, “winrate” : 0.7368421052631579, “rating” : 0.664179104477612
  14. “jean”, “count” : 80, “won” : 61, “lost” : 19, “winrate” : 0.7625, “rating” : 0.66
  15. “bionicsheep”, “count” : 47, “won” : 39, “lost” : 8, “winrate” : 0.8297872340425532, “rating” : 0.6567164179104478
  16. “mylreid”, “count” : 159, “won” : 112, “lost” : 47, “winrate” : 0.7044025157232704, “rating” : 0.6536312849162011
  17. “Happy Puppy”, “count” : 51, “won” : 41, “lost” : 10, “winrate” : 0.803921568627451, “rating” : 0.647887323943662
  18. “trare”, “count” : 31, “won” : 28, “lost” : 3, “winrate” : 0.9032258064516129, “rating” : 0.6470588235294118
  19. “Facecheck”, “count” : 84, “won” : 62, “lost” : 22, “winrate” : 0.7380952380952381, “rating” : 0.6442307692307693
  20. “theparty”, “count” : 58, “won” : 45, “lost” : 13, “winrate” : 0.7758620689655172, “rating” : 0.6410256410256411

Top 20 Runner players

  1. “raphaeln”, “count” : 57, “won” : 48, “lost” : 9, “winrate” : 0.8421052631578947, “rating” : 0.6883116883116883
  2. “TugtetguT”, “count” : 142, “won” : 100, “lost” : 42, “winrate” : 0.704225352112676, “rating” : 0.6481481481481481
  3. “Belryan”, “count” : 133, “won” : 94, “lost” : 39, “winrate” : 0.706766917293233, “rating” : 0.6470588235294118
  4. “andreasrem1980”, “count” : 24, “won” : 23, “lost” : 1, “winrate” : 0.9583333333333334, “rating” : 0.6363636363636364
  5. “trare”, “count” : 51, “won” : 40, “lost” : 11, “winrate” : 0.7843137254901961, “rating” : 0.6338028169014085
  6. “thebigunit3000”, “count” : 57, “won” : 43, “lost” : 14, “winrate” : 0.7543859649122807, “rating” : 0.6233766233766234
  7. “dishywashy”, “count” : 49, “won” : 38, “lost” : 11, “winrate” : 0.7755102040816326, “rating” : 0.6231884057971014
  8. “Bilitherubin”, “count” : 48, “won” : 37, “lost” : 11, “winrate” : 0.7708333333333334, “rating” : 0.6176470588235294
  9. “netrunnerunner”, “count” : 95, “won” : 66, “lost” : 29, “winrate” : 0.6947368421052632, “rating” : 0.6173913043478261
  10. “Teemo”, “count” : 65, “won” : 47, “lost” : 18, “winrate” : 0.7230769230769231, “rating” : 0.611764705882353
  11. “gameli”, “count” : 82, “won” : 57, “lost” : 25, “winrate” : 0.6951219512195121, “rating” : 0.6078431372549019
  12. “symbolic”, “count” : 64, “won” : 46, “lost” : 18, “winrate” : 0.71875, “rating” : 0.6071428571428571
  13. “jude111”, “count” : 94, “won” : 64, “lost” : 30, “winrate” : 0.6808510638297872, “rating” : 0.6052631578947368
  14. “ZacharyXylophone”, “count” : 101, “won” : 68, “lost” : 33, “winrate” : 0.6732673267326733, “rating” : 0.6033057851239669
  15. “surepiet”, “count” : 48, “won” : 36, “lost” : 12, “winrate” : 0.75, “rating” : 0.6029411764705882
  16. “Dracon_ian”, “count” : 70, “won” : 49, “lost” : 21, “winrate” : 0.7, “rating” : 0.6
  17. “treznor”, “count” : 54, “won” : 39, “lost” : 15, “winrate” : 0.7222222222222222, “rating” : 0.5945945945945946
  18. “Smaug”, “count” : 61, “won” : 43, “lost” : 18, “winrate” : 0.7049180327868853, “rating” : 0.5925925925925926
  19. “binnet”, “count” : 83, “won” : 56, “lost” : 27, “winrate” : 0.6746987951807228, “rating” : 0.5922330097087378
  20. “kwind”, “count” : 117, “won” : 76, “lost” : 41, “winrate” : 0.6495726495726496, “rating” : 0.5912408759124088

Most Corp games

  1. “Deathntaxes”, “count” : 206
  2. “Thana.”, “count” : 184
  3. “woodsy212”, “count” : 183
  4. “InOuterSpace”, “count” : 176
  5. “nandemo”, “count” : 164
  6. “mylreid”, “count” : 159
  7. “Aya Senpai”, “count” : 157
  8. “Rozen”, “count” : 156
  9. “Mordeqai”, “count” : 154
  10. “Elli”, “count” : 147
  11. “dihawk13”, “count” : 145
  12. “WildSam”, “count” : 145
  13. “dulux”, “count” : 143
  14. “AlexFrost”, “count” : 140
  15. “Zeofar”, “count” : 139
  16. “geist”, “count” : 136
  17. “Pestilence”, “count” : 135
  18. “dkavaichan”, “count” : 134
  19. “Kapital2”, “count” : 132
  20. “leonalightmyfire”, “count” : 125

Most Runner games

  1. “Jamesgrey”, “count” : 379
  2. “BizTheDad”, “count” : 285
  3. “Pestilence”, “count” : 265
  4. “NorwegianLegion”, “count” : 236
  5. “Synisill”, “count” : 216
  6. “neo_chess”, “count” : 171
  7. “dkavaichan”, “count” : 161
  8. “daytodave”, “count” : 150
  9. “Custard Pie”, “count” : 148
  10. “kitchenap”, “count” : 142
  11. “TugtetguT”, “count” : 142
  12. “Jagren”, “count” : 137
  13. “ejg5124”, “count” : 137
  14. “Smart_Alex”, “count” : 137
  15. “Belryan”, “count” : 133
  16. “hewlett”, “count” : 127
  17. “Voodoofly”, “count” : 125
  18. "ngorman@uwyo.edu", “count” : 122
  19. “Alan :3”, “count” : 121
  20. “mephi”, “count” : 118

#2

Sorted by faction

HB Win%
Engineering the Future 53.3%
Cerebral Imaging 50.8%
Chronos Protocol 45.2%
NEXT Design 44.6%
The Foundry 40.0%
Custom Biotics 37.4%
Stronger Together 34.7%
Cybernetics Division 34.6%

Jinteki Win%
Industrial Genomics 69.4%
Pālanā Foods 62.8%
Replicating Perfection" 56.2%
Personal Evolution 55.3%
Nisei Division 53.6%
Biotech 50.3%
Tennin Institute 46.5%
Harmony Medtech 45.9%

NBN Win%
Near-Earth Hub 65.4%
Controlling the Message 64.9%
New Angeles Sol 64.0%
SYNC 60.9%
Spark Agency 60.7%
Haarpsichord Studios 57.5%
Making News 53.8%
Harishchandra Ent. 52.8%
The World is Yours 46.6%

Weyland Win%
Argus Security 59.0%
Gagarin Deep Space 53.8%
Blue Sun 53.5%
Building a Better World 53.1%
Titan Transnational 50.1%
GRNDL 49.8%
Builder of Nations 30.5%
Because We Built It 20.1%

Anarch Win%
Whizzard 53.5%
Valencia Estevez 52.0%
MaxX 51.5%
Quetzal 42.8%
Noise 40.7%
Edward Kim 37.3%
Null 37.1%
Reina Roja 36.2%

Criminal Win%
Leela Patel 51.5%
Geist 50.0%
Andromeda 48.3%
Gabriel Santiago 45.1%
Ken Tenma 39.2%
Nero Severn 33.7%
Iain Stirling 32.7%
Silhouette 30.6%
Laramy Fisk 30.6%

Shaper Win%
Kate 47.1%
Hayley Kaplan 46.5%
Exile 44.4%
Jesminder Sareen 39.8%
Chaos Theory 35.6%
Kit 34.1%
The Professor 34.1%
Nasir Meidan 30.8%

Mini Win%
Adam 41.0%
Apex 39.6%
Sunny Lebeau 35.4%


#3

Is IG really approaching 70% without taking into account dropped games?


#4

A few things stand out to me:

  1. No shaper has win rate >50%
  2. Null is sitting near the bottom of the anarchs, despite some excitement for his ID ability
  3. Controlling the Message is second only to NEH among NBN at nearly 65%
  4. NEXT Design is not the worst HB ID

I could understand an argument that Null was suffering from being new, and people not having a good idea of how to play him yet, but Controlling the Message is from the same set, and proving very successful. I suspect the new NBN ID will rise as Whizz disappears from the meta, and asset spam runs unchecked.

As far as shapers go, I don’t think the new MWL helped them much. I am worried that shaper will become the major runner faction, but will continue to struggle as corp power creep pushes them well above what shapers can keep up with, particularly asset spam.


#5

Standouts for me:

Jnet community are really poor runners.

HB is the worst faction overall and their card pool is way below the power curve, but ETF restricts their design space so much. Removing the ID (or MWLing it?) would allow them to print HB cards of a much better power level.

I don’t think we can read to much into new IDs given the low sample of data aviailable for them.

Whizzes as the asset spam predator of choice will be replaced by Val / Scrubber & rebirth I think.


#6

I think asset spam is the most visible thing here. And it is only going to get worse post MWL if we are to judge the latest data pack. Apparently there will never be another Corp asset that costs more than 0 and costs less than 4 to trash.


#7

I’ve been wondering about that a bit. By all accounts, Palana offers a similar ability out of Jinteki, but we don’t see the same complaints about that faction (yet). I think this is because the other Jinteki IDs offer IDs that really drive different play styles outside of glacier, which has been the main focus of that faction. Even RP is glacier-with-a-twist that doesn’t overlap with Palana so completely.

HB’s color pie has been pretty thoroughly focused on Glacier since core, with little variation from this focus. There are not a lot of other ways to play HB’s card pool other than glacier. Early credits are important as a corp rush or glacier deck, and the ID ability with credits that can’t be turned off is really hard to compete with.


#8

I usually press concede after meeting my own win condition. I like acknowledging the game has concluded, I guess. That doesn’t damage your stats, does it?


#9

all they have is great ICE and biotic labour.


#10

To be fair, those are some pretty amazing cards to have in ‘the worst faction.’

Their best ICE tends to be bioroids, which are fine for supporting a glacier play, but not a lot of help for rush strategies. Even the Jeeves FA decks play more like a glacier than a rush-focused FA that we typically see in NBN.


#11

The other factions by comparison can support all styles of play:
Rush, Glacier, Kill, and Prison/attrition/spam

Hence their card pool has no depth to it. The last 2 packs released 3 new (and all very decent) pieces of HB ICE, which is the last thing they need. It smacks of the lets print another barrier in Weyland problem.


#12

The game only records the first win condition, so as long as you see the “Pops wins the game” message then you can concede afterward with no effect on your stats.


#13

Woah, congrats to RaphaelN for the #1 spot on the runner side! Can’t wait till you’re back in LA for some in person matches :).


#14

HB deserves another look because dumblefork had a great matchup against it, and has just been nerfed heavily. Sandburg will also be a great card in HB.


#15

The point is not that Etf or HB glacier is bad - far from it.
The point is there card pool lacks any depth which means they cannot really do anything but glacier (leaving aside a combo CI deck) - this shows in the other IDs winrates because either they have to do glacier out of an inferior ID, or a strategy that isnt supported by the cardpool.


#16

I think hb is the best FA post MWL. Although core HB is good at that too.


#17

It’s been nice having @raphaeln back in Ann Arbor for part of the Summer! He’s a great competitor and gentleman.


#18

Yay, I made a list that doesn’t involve the police :slight_smile:


#19

Ahn, thank you guys! :blush:
It’s great to be back to Ann Arbor during the summer, full of great and nice players here, just like LA! I’m lucky enough to play in two great metas!


#20

Hi mtgred,

thanks for running Jinteki.net and providing these stats.

I am actually learning R right now and would be interested in crunching some of Jinteki.net stats myself. I was wondering if you would make the raw data available?

Thanks,

Stephan