Proposed scoring system:
1 for top 32
2 for top 16
4 for top 8
6 for 4th
8 for 3rd
11 for 2nd
15 for 1st
+1 pt for highest ranked player of a given id (min top 50).
+3 pts for #1 after Swiss
+1 pt for highest weyland player
Not sure how many people on a team. Also, not sure if whether you want to draft or assign a set of restrictions. (No more than 1 national or us regional winner on a team seems like a possible one).
US regional winners don’t get a bye!
You could also just hit a series of upsets in your bracket that just tanks your sheet . . . . Pacer/Ahmed/Ross what the fuck happened?
Fine two separate restrictions and one extra scoring rule.
No more than 1 us regional winner on your team.
No more than 1 national winner on your team.
+1 pt for knocking out dan in elims
It might be easier and a lot more fun to just to this draft for the KOS15 event, since it’s capped at a reasonable amount and we already have a readied list of its players. Then things like top Weyland player stand to be more exciting to bet on
That’s a good idea.
That takes some assumption.
I’ve to do a better job this year than my fellow belgian last year.
So much pressure
Just make sure you have 4 credits before you access NAPD and you’ll be fine!
You laugh, but…
I see your esports and raise you US jurisprudence: https://fantasyscotus.lexpredict.com/ (Fantasy Supreme Court)
I’ll lay massive odds against @xenasis… And take any limit of bets.
Apologies. I fixed it.
With the most recent floor rules I think FFG axed the ability to gamble on major tournaments (by my reading) so I don’t mind moving this to the KOS15 event (is that the team tournament, I’m not up to date?) if people prefer that and if that’s better. It seems easier since we already have a list as well. If we want to draft players there are a couple ways we can do it over google docs:
1: synchronous, if we can figure out a mutually agreeable time.
2: asynchronous over a long period of time
3: semi-synchronous: those who can make it at a certain time draft and those who can’t write a list of their picks in order that can be operated by the moderator.
4: we can just pick players if we think there’s a large enough pool that choices aren’t obvious, but that isn’t as fun since choices tend to be more homogenised. this could be okay for team tournaments though since there’s a wider skill range.
Anyway this sounds very exciting! Looking forward to it!!! (in the absence of going to worlds)
Dan better have meant me when he said Xenasis.
Ill take either brit tbh
Xenasis isn’t coming. I tried to convince him to and even offered to put him in my suitcase but alas.
Fly him out with money from the Stimhack expenses account