Nope, I definitely haven't lost to a double Accelerated Diagnostics, and probably won't seeing as how it's an extreme nut draw, and top deck at the same time. But I have scorched a runner on turn 2 for the win...but I am kinda amiss at what your are saying? Are you saying because someone can throw a full court shot in basketball and win at the buzzer makes basketball a bad sport? Except that this just happens to be the reverse because it happens right at the beginning. Cause if you lost to AD like say 1 out 5 games every time you played then yeah I would agree 100% that would be lame and broken. But making a deck that is a 3 (or more in this case) card combo that "needs" to win on turn one, is hardly meta-wrecking. I would build magic decks (60 cards) That would "specifically" try and win in the first 5 turns. Most of the time you know what would happen? 2-2 on an FNM. These things are just not that big of a deal to most. But there have been times back in MTG, like "Memory Jar", which was probably the fastest card to get banned, where you could pull off a turn 1,2 or 3 turn kill like 75% of time. Is this what AD is doing? NOPE... I just see this game needing way more players, way more "fnm" style events, a few more years, and some top 8's where 6 out of 8 decks have about 43 out of 45 (or 46 out of 49) cards EXACTLY the SAME. And what's funny is even tho we only have a 408 card pool (excluding H&P) the decks still vary like crazy. Not to mention someone might play a certain corp but not play the same runner at other events. Yeah this game needs WAY more PLAY at least for a year if not two... my 2¢, oh and learn to cut!