I don’t really like the stat bars here, since the tournaments range across such a wide timespan but the bars only reflect overall data.
For instance, the stat bars make it look like Criminal is way ahead of everyone else. That’s certainly true historically, but the results from the 5 recorded events in the last 2 datapacks have 2 Criminals, 2 Shapers, and 1 Anarch, which is a much more balanced spread than the bars indicate. If someone thought “what’s good?” and looked at that page to find out, they could easily come to incorrect conclusions.
Also, the bars don’t actually seem accurate-- just look at Jinteki!
Yeah I was thinking of giving a historical perspective, but I could instead do the most recent data pack or two. (Although I think that coming to the conclusion that Criminal is best here would still be correct) I will take a look at changing it tonight, what do you think is best?
The bars highlight the name, hence why Jinteki has the highlight it does.
Thanks for updating the deck lists SneakySly, it’s a great resource for many reasons. I can’t wait to see all the store championship decks.
Here are the winning lists from a smaller tournament that took place in Portland on Jan 19th at Cloudcap Games(using True Colors), only 8 players. We will be having our first store championship this upcoming weekend though at Guardian Games. The runner deck might be 2 cards different, (-1 bank job, +1 something else)
We’re gonna need a database for this pretty soon :). I’ll have decklists from our second store championships soon (though it was just Good Stuff Andy and NBN Ops FA).
I took Jinteki:RP and Noise lists and tied for first in swiss, but couldn’t stay for the top-4 cut ;). Now those would have been interesting lists!