@jdeng got me the CT results the night of:
1 - Dan D’Argenio - Whiz, IG
2 - Max Gillett - Kate, NEH
3 - El-Ad David Amir - Kate, Gagarin
4 - Toby Foreman - Val, NEH
5/6 - Alex Konecky - Nero, Titan
5/6 - David Stair - Noise, ETF
7/8 - Derek Anderson - Val, NEH
7/8 - Eugene Ku - Kit, Gagarin
Is your data publicly available somewhere? It would be nice to be able to glance at whenever.
Pasadena regionals (5/21/16, 56 players):
1) Alan Chihwaro - NEH / Whizzard
2) Jason Jackson (@corporationsrule) - NEH / Whizzard
3) Stephen Ebrey (@StephenE) - NEH / Leela
4) Alex Cohen - NEH / Whizzard
5-6) Jeff Odell - NEH / Noise
5-6) Manuel Legang - SYNC / Whizzard
7-8) Kyle James (@bluebird503) - IG / Whizzard
7-8) Nathan Rensen - PE / Whizzard
Nathan was on Whizzard.
Holy hell that’s a bold choice of IDs. Is the Nero list floating around anywhere?
Not yet, just in a SQL database right now. I have to work on a website of some kind to get it up on. I registered topcutnetrunner.com. We’ll see how it goes – I definitely want to make this data more public. Generally speaking, I think the lack of event reporting and deck list publication in Netrunner is rather unfortunate, and it would be nice if things like deck distributions and deck list publication were the norm.
Sweet, thanks! You wouldn’t happen to have Vegas data, would you?
Melbourne also only had 3 anarch. 2 noise and 1 DLR Maxx. And 2 crims Leela and Andy
Nothing so complete, I’m afraid! Maybe other Stimhackers will be able to fill in the gaps?
Las Vegas regionals (5/7/2016, 35 players):
1) Timmy Wong - SYNC / Whizzard
2) Jon Dalesandry (@Sirris) - IG / Noise
3) Isaac L. (@NyanPudge) - HB: EtF / Valencia
4) Mike Summers (@mike.summers) - Blue Sun / MaxX
5-6) Austin Bell - Haarpsichord / MaxX
5-6) Brian Lenhoff - NEH / Whizzard
7-8) Spencer Healey (@Heartthrob) - NEH / Valencia
7-8) Elmon Apgood - NEH / Whizzard
knowthemeta? I think your effort is more useful because knowthemeta seems like it only enters things for which it has full lists, whereas you only require identities.
Knowthemeta is great, but it suffers from the same problems I’m having, where TOs don’t report results or submit them to Acoo, and players usually don’t publish deck lists or connect them to Acoo. Both me and Knowthemeta would benefit from greater transparency from TOs and players.
I’m only going for top 8s and IDs, whereas KTM wants everything. It’s a lot easier for me to find a top 8 than it is for KTM to get a full tournament breakdown, and it’s already pretty hard for me. I don’t know if KTM actively pursues tournament data.
One problem is that NRTM is the only tournament software I know of that exports to Acoo. I think everyone else has to do it by hand. TOME doesn’t even record which sides won vs. each other, just prestige changes, so there’s no hope for interesting matchup stats from that program. One day when I get myself cloned, I’ll make a decent Netrunner tournament program that is available for more than iPhone that makes publishing results and stats easy.
Thrones has a pretty good effort with annals of castle black I don’t see why we couldn’t pull it off. Would need some coordination, effort, and maybe some time.
Ah yes, my mistake! Thank you.
Elmon Apgood is the missing person here. He brought Whizz/NEH
Am I correct in saying that Elmon got 5/6, and you and Brian got 7/8?
Acco takes ANRTournament file and you just check if everything is in order. It’s very easy to upload, but yeah, I would prefer to do it from the program level. 
Thanks! Dodgepong correctly linked my Nero list.
I’m not sure on that actually. I went into the cut as 1st Seed, he went in as 4th I think. We both lost our first two games in the cut, so not sure how that shakes out. Frankly doesn’t matter to me lol.
Seeds aren’t traditionally used to shake out 5th place vs. 6th place, nor 7th place vs. 8th place. They are just listed as tied for 5th and tied for 7th (or “5/6” and “7/8”). So all I wanted to confirm was that Elmon tied for 5th, and you and Brian tied for 7th.
Acoo appears to use seed to determine top 8 positioning. Am I wrong on that?
I don’t how Acoo does it, but that is not normal for double elimination tournaments to do. You can’t just say that the higher seed is better when making full rankings. Seeding is already pretty tight from swiss with randomness from tiebreakers and people making top 8 through IDs. The only fair way to do it is via a tiebreaker match, but that would take more time and would not really be double elimination anymore, strictly speaking. So instead, people just leave it as tied for 5th and 7th. If it was a 16-player bracket, there would also be a 4-way tie for 9th and a 4-way tie for 13th. For example, check out how the Capcom Pro Tour listed rankings for a double elimination tournament they held, or how Challonge.com listed results from the Huntsville Regional (full bracket link here).
If it makes it easier to think about, suppose it was single elimination instead of double. 4 people knocked out after round 1, then 2 people knocked out after round 2, then 1 person knocked out after round 3. There’s an explicit 1st and 2nd, but 3 and 4 are “tied”, and 5-8 are “tied”. In such tournaments, they are not then ranked by seed, they are listed as tied. This is exactly what MTG does: Modern event - Grand Prix Los Angeles 2016 @ mtgtop8.com (look at rankings along the left side)
